For the reasons stated in State v. Ortiz-Zape,_N.C._,_, _ S.E.2d_,_(2013), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded for consideration of the remaining issues on appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
State v. Hurt, 367 N.C. 80 (2013)
June 27, 2013
·
Supreme Court of North Carolina
·
No. 505PA10
367 N.C. 80
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID FRANKLIN HURT
No. 505PA10
(Filed 27 June 2013)
On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 208 N.C. App. 1, 702 S.E.2d 82 (2010), finding prejudicial error in a judgment entered on 4 April 2008 by Judge Thomas D. Haigwood in Superior Court, Caldwell County, and remanding for a new sentencing trial. Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 February 2013.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P O’Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.
Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee.
dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Hudson’s dissenting opinions in State v. Ortiz-Zape, _N.C. _, _ S.E.2d_ (2013) (329PA11) and State v. Brewington,__N.C._,_S.E.2d_(2013) (235PA10).
Justice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.