After hearing oral arguments and considering the new briefs of counsel, the Court concludes that discretionary review was improvidently allowed.
Discretionary review improvidently allowed.
Talbot v. North Carolina Department of Transportation, 326 N.C. 590 (1990)
May 10, 1990
·
Supreme Court of North Carolina
·
No. 435PA89
326 N.C. 590
FREDDA DIANE BAYNOR TALBOT v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES
No. 435PA89
(Filed 10 May 1990)
On discretionary review, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31, of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 95 N.C. App. 446, 382 S.E.2d 447 (1989), affirming the Decision and Order of the North Carolina Industrial Commission entered 7 June 1988. Heard in the Supreme Court 10 April 1990.
Carter, Archie & Hassell, by Sid Hassell, Jr., for the plaintiff-appellee.
Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by Victor H. E. Morgan, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant-appellant.