Jeff Tacina appeals from the entry by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County of summary judgment in favor of St. Louis Community College (SLCC). We affirm. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Tacina v. St. Louis Cmty. Coll., 577 S.W.3d 155 (2019)
May 28, 2019
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
·
No. ED 106889
577 S.W.3d 155
Jeff TACINA, Appellant,
v.
ST. LOUIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Respondent.
No. ED 106889
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: May 28, 2019
Rehearing Denied June 24, 2019
FOR APPELLANT: Jeff Tacina, Acting Pro Se.
FOR RESPONDENTS: Mark Hanson Zoole, P.O. Box 190549, St. Louis, Missouri 63119.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., James M. Dowd, J., and Robin Ransom, J.
ORDER