Antawan Ross appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).
Ross v. State, 575 S.W.3d 806 (2019)
June 4, 2019
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
·
No. ED 106832
575 S.W.3d 806
Antawan ROSS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106832
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: June 4, 2019
Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.
Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton, III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER