Samuel Vazquez-Gonzalez appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Vazquez-Gonzalez v. State, 570 S.W.3d 201 (2019)
March 19, 2019
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
·
ED 106638
570 S.W.3d 201
Samuel VAZQUEZ-GONZALEZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ED 106638
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: March 19, 2019
Kevin B. Gau, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
Eric Schmitt, Justin A. Moody, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
*202ORDER