Joshua Ray appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon its finding following a court trial convicting him of three counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree and one count of furnishing pornographic materials to a minor. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
State v. Ray, 568 S.W.3d 89 (2019)
Feb. 26, 2019
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
·
No. ED 105957
568 S.W.3d 89
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent,
v.
Joshua RAY, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 105957
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: February 26, 2019
Christian Lehmberg, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant.
Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER