In May 2014, Appellant Sterling Evans was an inmate at the Farmington Correctional Center. He was investigated for alleged misconduct, which resulted in prison discipline, but no criminal charges. Evans filed a petition for expungement of the records of the prison misconduct investigation pursuant to § 610.122, RSMo. The circuit court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, because Evans did not seek expungement of the sort of "records of arrest" addressed in § 610.122, RSMo, and because he was ineligible for expungement because he had been previously convicted of a felony. Evans *459appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
Evans v. Precythe, 568 S.W.3d 458 (2019)
Jan. 22, 2019
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
·
WD 81826
568 S.W.3d 458
Sterling EVANS, Appellant,
v.
Ann PRECYTHE and Matthew Pierce, Respondents.
WD 81826
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Filed: January 22, 2019
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 26, 2019
Sterling M. Evans, Bonne Terre, appellant pro se.
Peter Houser, Jefferson City for respondents.
Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.
ORDER