Patrick D. Peete (Movant) appeals the judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant argues that the motion court clearly erred because his convictions for sixteen counts of stealing and concurrent seven-year sentences were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in State v. Bazell, 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Peete v. State, 567 S.W.3d 670 (2018)
Nov. 20, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
·
ED 106330
567 S.W.3d 670
Patrick D. PEETE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ED 106330
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: November 20, 2018
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 27, 2018
Application for Transfer Denied March 5, 2019
Kristina S. Olsen, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
Joshua D. Hawley, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
*671ORDER