Behlmann v. State, 565 S.W.3d 254 (2019)

Jan. 8, 2019 · Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR · No. ED 105671

565 S.W.3d 254

Jeremy R. BEHLMANN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105671

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: January 8, 2019

Katharine P. Curry, 1000 W. Nifong Bldg. 7 Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Movant/Appellant.

Justin A. Moody, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Behlmann ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his plea counsel was ineffective. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).