Jonathan Rommel Rice appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a request for adjournment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
State v. Rice, 559 S.W.3d 115 (2018)
Oct. 16, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
·
No. ED 105719
559 S.W.3d 115
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent,
v.
Jonathan Rommel RICE, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 105719
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 16, 2018
Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Plaintiff/Respondent.
Carol D. Jansen, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Defendant/Appellant.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER