Casitdel Wooten appeals the motion court's judgment dismissing his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use *115only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Wooten v. State, 559 S.W.3d 114 (2018)
Oct. 16, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
·
No. ED 105810
559 S.W.3d 114
Casitdel WOOTEN, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 105810
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 16, 2018
Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Garrick F. D. Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER