Anthony K. Hill appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 29.15 (2015) after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2018).
Hill v. State, 557 S.W.3d 526 (2018)
Sept. 11, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
·
ED 105803
557 S.W.3d 526
Anthony K. HILL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ED 105803
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: September 11, 2018
Samuel E. Buffaloe, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Joshua D. Hawley, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
ORDER