John Loomis appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Loomis argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that trial counsel failed to *582move for a mistrial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Loomis v. State, 550 S.W.3d 581 (2018)
June 26, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
·
WD 80402
550 S.W.3d 581
John M. LOOMIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 80402
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: June 26, 2018
Samuel E. Buffaloe, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge
ORDER