Antonieo D. Clark appeals from a judgment denying his Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 29.15 (2014) amended motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 84.16(b) (2018).
Clark v. State, 547 S.W.3d 161 (2018)
May 15, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
·
No. ED 105375
547 S.W.3d 161
Antonieo D. CLARK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105375
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Filed: May 15, 2018
Alexandria A. Shah, Saint Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER