Kevin D. Recar ("Movant") appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his post-conviction relief motion because there was an insufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea of trafficking methamphetamine in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs *686of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2015).
Recar v. State, 544 S.W.3d 685 (2018)
April 10, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
·
No. ED 105730
544 S.W.3d 685
Kevin D. RECAR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105730
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: April 10, 2018
Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.
Robert J. Bartholomew, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER