Anthony Graves appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He claims the trial court clearly erred because reasonably competent counsel would have investigated and presented evidence that the victim was killed by a shot fired by someone other than Graves and that would have changed the outcome of Graves's trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Graves v. State, 544 S.W.3d 327 (2018)
April 24, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
·
WD 80709
544 S.W.3d 327
Anthony T. GRAVES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 80709
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Order filed: April 24, 2018
Ellen H. Flottman, for Appellant
Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, for Respondent
Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge
ORDER