*891Ronald L. Mills appeals from the motion court's denial of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Mills v. State, 540 S.W.3d 890 (2018)
March 6, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
·
No. ED 105349
540 S.W.3d 890
Ronald L. MILLS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 105349
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: March 6, 2018
Maleaner R. Harvey, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant
Mary Highland Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
ORDER