James W. Lewis appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the *889decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Lewis v. State, 540 S.W.3d 888 (2018)
March 6, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
·
ED 105167
540 S.W.3d 888
James W. LEWIS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
ED 105167
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: March 6, 2018
Annette M. Wallace, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO 64105, For Movant/Appellant.
Evan J. Buchheim, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
ORDER