Mr. David R. Burke appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief, based on ineffective assistance of counsel, after an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Burke v. State, 539 S.W.3d 81 (2017)
Dec. 5, 2017
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
·
WD 80243
539 S.W.3d 81
David R. BURKE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 80243
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: December 5, 2017
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 30, 2018
S. Kathleen (Kate) Webber, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Julia E. Neidhardt, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Gary D. Witt and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges
Order