Reed v. State, 539 S.W.3d 740 (2017)

Oct. 17, 2017 · Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE · No. ED 104753

539 S.W.3d 740

Jesse W. REED, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 104753

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: October 17, 2017
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 19, 2017

Amy E. Lowe, Matthew J. Bell, Co-Counsel, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jesse W. Reed ("Movant") appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant raises four points, asserting claims of error involving double jeopardy, ineffective assistance of counsel, and disproportionate sentences. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1 All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2017).