Bryian Fips appeals from the motion court's order denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.0351 after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Fips v. State, 539 S.W.3d 119 (2018)
Feb. 6, 2018
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
·
No. ED 105215
539 S.W.3d 119
Bryian FIPS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 105215
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: February 6, 2018
Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Movant/Appellant.
Christine K. Lesicko, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
ORDER