In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the judgment, sentences, and the order revoking Appellant's probation. However, we remand for the entry of a corrected probation revocation order that conforms to the trial court's oral pronouncement that revocation was based only upon Appellant's new law offenses. See Thomas v. State , 255 So. 3d 997, 997 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (affirming the revocation of probation and sentence but remanding for entry of a corrected revocation order that conformed *251to the trial court's oral pronouncement); Sesco v. State , 254 So. 3d 1196, 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (affirming the revocation of probation and sentence but remanding for the trial court to enter a corrected revocation order reflecting, consistent with its oral pronouncement, that the revocation was based only on the new law offenses); Ross v. State , 212 So. 3d 1149, 1150 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (affirming the revocation of probation and sentences but remanding for entry of a corrected revocation order that conformed to the trial court's oral pronouncement).
AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction.
Lewis, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.