Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that the appellate court should affirm the trial court's judgment where "the record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error"); Dabas v. Boston Invr's. Grp., Inc., 231 So.3d 542, 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (concluding that the borrower's due process rights were not violated *485where the borrower's counsel received notice of, and participated fully at, a non-evidentiary hearing without objection and without seeking a continuance of the hearing).
E. Coast Capital Inv., LLC v. Naima Grp., LLC, 274 So. 3d 484 (2019)
May 29, 2019
·
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
·
No. 3D18-535
274 So. 3d 484
EAST COAST CAPITAL INVESTMENT, LLC, et al., Appellants,
v.
NAIMA GROUP, LLC, Appellee.
No. 3D18-535
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed May 29, 2019
Dieppa Law Firm, P.A., and Eduardo E. Dieppa, III, Hialeah, for appellants.
Escalante Yormack Law, PLLC, and Francisco J. Escalante and Adam J. Yormack, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.