Affirmed. See Cox v. State, 221 So.3d 723, 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (holding: "Unlike a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to rule 3.800(a) places the burden upon the defendant ... to affirmatively identify court records which, on their face, demonstrate the existence of an illegal sentence or an entitlement to relief under rule 3.800(a)"); Llerena v. State, 953 So.2d 31, 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (noting: "Concurrent sentences do not necessarily begin at the same time, and unless they are ordered to be coterminous, they will expire on different dates"); Knight v. State, 832 So.2d 172, 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (affirming order denying motion for postconviction relief where the "plea colloquy contain[ed] no indication that the sentence was to be coterminous with any other sentence").
Eady v. State, 273 So. 3d 97 (2019)
Jan. 23, 2019
·
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
·
No. 3D18-2013
273 So. 3d 97
Tauron EADY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D18-2013
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed January 23, 2019.
Rehearing Denied February 18, 2019
Tauron Eady, in proper person.
Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.