Michael McAlkich appeals his convictions and sentences following a jury trial, arguing that the trial court erred in imposing a prison releasee reoffender sentence on his conviction for battery on a law enforcement officer.1 The State properly conceded error on appeal.2 See Elmore v. State, 172 So.3d 465, 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) ("It is undisputed that battery on a law enforcement officer is neither a qualifying nor an enumerated offense under the PRR statute. Moreover, the erroneous imposition of PRR status renders a sentence illegal." (first citing State v. Hearns, 961 So.2d 211, 212 (Fla. 2007), then citing Kirkland v. State, 71 So.3d 254, 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) ) ). Accordingly, we affirm McAlkich's convictions and sentences on counts one and three without further comment, but we reverse McAlkich's sentence on count two and remand for the trial court to strike the PRR designation.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.
KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.