I agree with the denial of plaintiff's writ application. I write separately to reiterate my view that plaintiff's arguments, which have previously been denied but are nonetheless repeated here, "lack any iota of legal merit" and are a troubling cause of unnecessary litigation. See Willis v. EAN Holdings , 17-0789 (La. 9/22/17), 226 So.3d 438 (J. Crichton additionally concurring). Plaintiff's application is once again an egregious waste of judicial resources, and I find that her frivolous appeal warranted the damages imposed upon plaintiff therefor.
Willis v. EAN Holdings, 266 So. 3d 283 (2019)
March 18, 2019
·
Louisiana Supreme Court
·
No. 2019-C-0139
266 So. 3d 283
Marsha A. WILLIS
v.
EAN HOLDINGS d/b/a Enterprise Rent A Car, Elco Insurance Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation and Troy David Thibodeaux
No. 2019-C-0139
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
March 18, 2019
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE
Writ denied.
CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons: