*956Affirmed .
Gerber, C.J., and Taylor, J., concur.
Forst, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion.
Garcia Solar v. State, 264 So. 3d 955 (2019)
Feb. 6, 2019
·
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
·
No. 4D18-1714
264 So. 3d 955
Jose Luis GARCIA SOLAR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D18-1714
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[February 6, 2019]
Jose Luis Garcia Solar, Okeechobee, pro se.
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
I respectfully dissent in part. Appellant was not afforded an evidentiary hearing on any of the claims raised in his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. I agree with the majority in finding no error in the trial court summarily denying six of the seven claims. However, I would remand for an evidentiary hearing with respect to Appellant's contention that counsel's failure to move to exclude incriminating evidence of items found in the vehicle in which Appellant was stopped constituted reversible ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant "stated a legally sufficient claim for relief, and the record before this court does not conclusively refute the claim." Harris v. State , 74 So.3d 567, 568 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).