Ali v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 264 So. 3d 1096 (2019)

Feb. 15, 2019 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District · Case No. 5D15-2796
264 So. 3d 1096

Mohammed N. ALI, Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., etc., Appellee.

Case No. 5D15-2796

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 15, 2019

Michael P. Fuino, of Weidner Law, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Kimberly S. Mello, Laura J. Bassini and Vitaliy Kats, of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment in all respects except for the attorney's fee award. Because Wells Fargo failed to present any competent, substantial evidence to support the number of hours spent on the case, the hourly rate, or the total fee, we reverse that portion of the final judgment awarding attorney's fees.1 See Michel v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 191 So.3d 981, 984 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ; see also B & H Miracle, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 227 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ; Freiman v. Nat'l City Mortg. Co., 183 So.3d 1111, 1112 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; Warner v. Warner, 692 So.2d 266, 268 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED, in part; and REVERSED, in part.

BERGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.