Affirmed. See State v. Craycraft, 704 So.2d 593, 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding that a warrant was not necessary for officers' second "entry" into a property where exigent circumstances made the officers' first entry lawful, the evidence seized during the second entry was observed during the first entry, and "[t]he second 'entry' was clearly part of one continuous episode.")
Viart-Sotolongo v. State, 255 So. 3d 522 (2018)
Oct. 10, 2018
·
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
·
No. 3D17-1411
255 So. 3d 522
Renan VIART-SOTOLONGO, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D17-1411
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed October 10, 2018
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.