Affirmed. See Santa Rosa Cty. v. Administration Com'n, Div. of Admin. Hearings, 661 So.2d 1190, 1193 (Fla. 1995) (observing that "Florida courts will not render, in the form of a declaratory judgment, what amounts to an advisory opinion at the instance of parties who show merely the possibility of legal injury on the basis of a hypothetical 'state of facts which have not arisen' and are only 'contingent, uncertain, [and] rest in the future.' " (quoting *764LaBella v. Food Fair, Inc., 406 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) ) (additional citations omitted) ) ); Behm v. Campbell, 925 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (holding that defendant's plea of no contest, accompanied by a withhold of adjudication of guilt, nevertheless established probable cause for the defendant's arrest and precluded a collateral challenge of the legality of that arrest by way of a civil suit for false arrest).
Spataru v. Ramsay, 239 So. 3d 763 (2018)
March 7, 2018
·
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
·
No. 3D17–671
239 So. 3d 763
Valentin SPATARU, Appellant,
v.
Rick RAMSAY, etc., Appellee.
No. 3D17-671
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed March 7, 2018
Valentin Spataru, in proper person.
Purdy, Jolly, Giuffreda & Barranco, P.A., and Gregory J. Jolly (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before LAGOA, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.