Forney v. State, 238 So. 3d 839 (2018)

Feb. 28, 2018 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District · No. 4D17–3854

238 So. 3d 839

James FORNEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3854

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 28, 2018]

James Forney, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant's successive rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We write only to address appellant's claim that the orders entered after he filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge were void. This claim is meritless because appellant failed to serve the motion on the judge. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(c), (j) ; Braddy v. State , 111 So.3d 810, 833 (Fla. 2012) ; Hedrick v. State , 6 So.3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed .

Warner, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.