Falcon v. Mango Hill Condo. Ass'n No. 2, Inc., 238 So. 3d 382 (2017)

Dec. 27, 2017 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District · No. 3D17–1029
238 So. 3d 382

Florentino FALCON, Appellant,
v.
MANGO HILL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION NO. 2, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-1029

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017

David Low & Associates, P.A. and Amanda Sidman (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant.

Nancy C. Wear, for appellees.

Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and LINDSEY, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Florentino Falcon appeals from a final order dismissing his first amended complaint with prejudice. Because we find that the complaint asserted a viable claim and that dismissal was not appropriate to resolve the issue of whether Falcon's back patio was a "limited common element" pursuant to the Declaration of Condominium, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. We make no findings as to the nature of the patio or the parties' rights and responsibilities under the Declaration.

Reversed and remanded.