Wilder v. State, 806 S.E.2d 200, 343 Ga. App. 110 (2017)

Oct. 4, 2017 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · A17A1727
806 S.E.2d 200, 343 Ga. App. 110

WILDER
v.
The STATE.

A17A1727

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

October 4, 2017

David Edward Clark, for Appellant.

William P. Doupé, District Attorney, Kevin R. Majeska, Assistant District Attorney, for Appellee.

Ellington, Presiding Judge.

*110On May 29, 2009, a Lincoln County jury found James Glenn Wilder guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in Case No. 2005-CR-3630 of aggravated child molestation, child molestation, statutory rape, and sexual exploitation of a child (two counts), based on acts he committed in 2003 and 2004. After a series of proceedings, including consideration by the Supreme Court of Georgia, Wilder's convictions were *111affirmed.1 In August 2013, the case returned to the trial court for resentencing as directed in Wilder's original direct appeal, Wilder v. State, 304 Ga.App. 891, 895-896 (6), 698 S.E.2d 374 (2010). The trial court sentenced Wilder to thirty years, to serve twenty in prison, for aggravated child molestation; five years for child molestation,2 consecutive; five years for statutory rape, *201concurrent; and five years for each count of sexual exploitation of a child, concurrent. The sentences totaled thirty-five years, to serve twenty-five years in prison.

Wilder filed a motion for new trial after the resentencing.3 The trial court conducted a hearing on February 16, 2017. The parties informed the court that they were in agreement that Wilder was entitled to be resentenced with respect to the child molestation conviction, which was Count 2, on the basis that OCGA § 17-10-6.2, which was enacted in 2006, requires a split sentence of at least the statutory minimum sentence of imprisonment for the offense plus at least one year of probation.4 At the time of the hearing, the applicable statutory range for child molestation was not less than five nor more than twenty years imprisonment. OCGA § 16-6-4 (b) (1) (2017) ("[A] person convicted of a first offense of child molestation shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years[.]"). The trial court resentenced Wilder on Count 2 to five years consecutive to Count 1 (aggravated child molestation) plus an additional year on probation, for a total of six years, to serve five, on Count 2. The sentences now total thirty-six years, to serve twenty-five years in prison. Wilder again appeals.

In the current appeal, Wilder contends that, because OCGA § 17-10-6.2 was not enacted until after he committed the offenses in 2003 and 2004, the parties were mistaken in believing that the Code section applies. In this, Wilder is correct.5 It does not necessarily follow, however, that reversal is required.

*112"Under Georgia law, a sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law does not allow. A sentence that falls within the prescribed statutory limits, however, is legally authorized and is not subject to review by this Court." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Few v. State, 311 Ga.App. 608, 716 S.E.2d 644 (2011). See also Monroe v. State, 250 Ga. 30, 36 (7), 295 S.E.2d 512 (1982) ("The trial court has the discretion to impose sentence within the parameters prescribed by the statute and if the sentence is within the statutory limits, the appellate courts will not review it.") (citations omitted). Wilder's present sentence on Count 2 of six years, to serve five, falls within the applicable statutory range of sentencing, that is, according to the provisions of the law existing in 2003 and 2004, for a first offense of child molestation.6 Because the sentence is legally authorized, we will not review it. Moreover, even if the trial court mistakenly believed that it was required, rather than merely authorized, to impose a split sentence on Count 2 of at least five years in prison plus at least one year on probation, any such sentencing error was induced by Wilder and affords no grounds for reversal. See Torres v. State, 272 Ga. 389, 392 (7), 529 S.E.2d 883 (2000) ("It is well established that induced error is impermissible and furnishes no ground for reversal."); Gorman v. State, 318 Ga.App. 535, 540 (4), 734 S.E.2d 263 (2012) ("One cannot complain of a result he procured *202or aided in causing, and induced error is not an appropriate basis for claiming prejudice.") (punctuation and citation omitted).

Judgment affirmed.

Andrews and Rickman, JJ., concur.