Keyzer v. Amerlink, Ltd., 626 S.E.2d 299 (2005)

Dec. 1, 2005 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · No. 587A05.
626 S.E.2d 299
Ludovicus N. KEYZER, a/k/a Ludo Keyzer, Joseph Kintz, Robin Kintz, Carl W. Parker, III, and Barry Nakell v. AMERLINK, LTD., Richard Spoor, Deborah N. Meyer, John Meuser, Meyer & Meuser, P.A., American Detective Services, Inc., and Kenneth J. Johnson.

Ludovicus N. KEYZER, a/k/a Ludo Keyzer, Joseph Kintz, Robin Kintz, Carl W. Parker, III, and Barry Nakell
v.
AMERLINK, LTD., Richard Spoor, Deborah N. Meyer, John Meuser, Meyer & Meuser, P.A., American Detective Services, Inc., and Kenneth J. Johnson.

No. 587A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Barry Nakell, for Ludovicus N. Keyzer, et al.

Richard T. Boyette, Alycia S. Levy, Kari R. Johnson, Raleigh, for Deborah N. Meyer, et al.

Steven C. Lawrence, Fayetteville, for Amerlink & Spoor.

Patrick D. Sarsfield, II, Charlotte, for American Detective Ser., et al.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiffs on the 19th day of October 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."

Plaintiffs shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Plaintiffs new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.