Gillespie v. Reverse Mortg. Solutions, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 1294, 203 L. Ed. 2d 412 (2019)

March 4, 2019 · Supreme Court of the United States · No. 18–7225.

139 S. Ct. 1294, 203 L. Ed. 2d 412

Neil GILLESPIE, petitioner,
v.
REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.

No. 18-7225.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1 See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).