Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner *1749unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1 See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992)(per curiam).
Ochoa v. Rubin, 135 S. Ct. 1748, 191 L. Ed. 2d 699 (2015)
April 6, 2015
·
Supreme Court of the United States
·
No. 14–8625.
135 S. Ct. 1748, 191 L. Ed. 2d 699
Michael Ramon OCHOA, petitioner,
v.
Erin RUBIN.
No. 14-8625.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 6, 2015.
Opinion