Elaine Steele & Rosa & Raymond Parks Inst. for Self Dev. v. McCauley, 920 N.W.2d 123 (2018)

Dec. 4, 2018 · Michigan Supreme Court · SC: 157876, SC: 157877, SC: 157878; COA: 332305, 334192, 339192
920 N.W.2d 123

ELAINE STEELE AND ROSA & Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Sylvester MCCAULEY, Deborah Ross, Asheber Macharia, Robert D. McCauley, Yvonne Trussel, Rosalind Bridgeforth, Susan McCauley, Shirley McCauley, Sheila McCauley Keys, Richard McCauley, Cheryl McCauley, Rhea McCauley, and William McCauley, Defendants-Appellees.

Elaine Steele and Rosa & Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
Steven G. Cohen, Appellant,
v.
Sylvester McCauley, Deborah Ross, Asheber Macharia, Robert D. McCauley, Yvonne Trussel, Rosalind Bridgeforth, Susan McCauley, Shirley McCauley, Sheila

McCauley Keys, Richard McCauley, Cheryl McCauley, Rhea McCauley, and William McCauley, Defendants-Appellees.

In re Estate of Rosa Louise Parks.

Elaine Steele and Rosa & Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
Sylvester McCauley, Deborah Ross, Asheber Macharia, Robert D. McCauley, Yvonne Trussel, Rosalind Bridgeforth, Susan McCauley, Shirley McCauley, Sheila McCauley Keys, Richard McCauley, Cheryl McCauley, Rhea McCauley, and William McCauley, Respondents-Appellees.

SC: 157876, SC: 157877, SC: 157878
COA: 332305, 334192, 339192

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 4, 2018

*124Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.