Yoches v. City of Dearborn, 911 N.W.2d 189 (2018)

May 16, 2018 · Michigan Supreme Court · SC: 156357; COA: 330998; SC: 156358; COA: 331137; SC: 156359; COA: 331139; SC: 156360; COA: 331144; SC: 156361; COA: 331147; SC: 156362; COA: 331149; SC: 156363; COA: 331630
911 N.W.2d 189

Adrienne Renee YOCHES, Individually and as Next Friend to Samuel James Yoches, Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
Troy Gibson, Jodi Jergovich, and Steve Jergovich, Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF DEARBORN, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Adam Forehand, Defendant.

Laura Jo Lubeck and Ronald Lubeck, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
City of Dearborn, Defendant-Appellant.

Troy Gibson, Jodi Jergovich, and Steve Jergovich, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
City of Dearborn and Camp Dearborn, Defendants-Appellants,
and
Adam Forehand, Defendant.

Lauren Marie Calvin and Troy Ray Gibson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
City of Dearborn, d/b/a Camp Dearborn, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Adam O'Brien Forehand, Defendant.

Charlotte Bader, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
City of Dearborn, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Adam Forehand, Defendant.

Cynthia Cialone, Individually and as Next Friend to Emmanuelle Soufane, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
City of Dearborn, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Adam Forehand, Defendant.

Adrienne Renee Yoches, Individually and as Next Friend to Samuel James Yoches, Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
Troy Gibson, Jodi Jergovich, and Steve Jergovich, Plaintiffs,
and
Cynthia Cialone, Individually and as Next Friend to Emmanuelle Soufane, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant/Appellee,
v.
City of Dearborn, Defendant/Counterplaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Adam Forehand, Defendant,
and
Henry Ford Community College Support Staff Association, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

SC: 156357
COA: 330998
SC: 156358
COA: 331137
SC: 156359
COA: 331139
SC: 156360
COA: 331144
SC: 156361
COA: 331147
SC: 156362
COA: 331149
SC: 156363
COA: 331630

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 16, 2018

*190Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 13, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.