Grievance Comm. for the Ninth Judicial Dist. v. Feng Li (In re Feng Li), 92 N.E.3d 1239, 69 N.Y.S.3d 849, 30 N.Y.3d 1082 (2018)

Jan. 16, 2018 · New York Court for the Correction of Errors · 2017–933

92 N.E.3d 1239, 69 N.Y.S.3d 849, 30 N.Y.3d 1082

In the MATTER OF FENG LI, a suspended attorney.

Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Respondent;
v.
Feng Li, Appellant.

2017-933

Court of Appeals of New York.

January 16, 2018

On the Court's own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the March 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it is untimely (see CPLR 5513[a] ; Eaton v. State of New York , 76 N.Y.2d 824 [1990] ); appeal, insofar as taken from the July 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it is untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b] ; Eaton v. State of New York , 76 N.Y.2d 824 [1990] ); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.