Commonwealth v. Begun, 102 N.E.3d 1030, 92 Mass. App. Ct. 1125 (2018)

Feb. 2, 2018 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · 17–P–528
102 N.E.3d 1030, 92 Mass. App. Ct. 1125

COMMONWEALTH
v.
H. Keith BEGUN.

17-P-528

Appeals Court of Massachusetts.

Entered: February 2, 2018

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1: 28

After a trial, a jury convicted the defendant of violating G. L. c. 267, § 1,2 for submitting a falsified bill of sale to his employer, the town of Shirley, for reimbursement. On appeal, both the defendant and the Commonwealth agree that count 1 of the complaint was defective for failing to allege sufficient facts that would constitute a violation of G. L. c. 267, § 1. To sustain a conviction under G. L. c. 267, § 1, the Commonwealth must prove that the defendant "with intent to injure or defraud, falsely ma[de], alter[ed], forge[d] or counterfeit[ed]" one of the instruments enumerated therein. Commonwealth v. Levin, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 482, 493 (1981). As the parties correctly note, a bill of sale is not one of the instruments named in the statute. Thus, due to this defect, the District Court had no jurisdiction over count 1 of the complaint. See Commonwealth v. Dykens, 473 Mass. 635, 648 (2016), quoting from Commonwealth v. Cantres, 405 Mass. 238, 239-240 (1989) ("Where an indictment fails to allege a fact necessary to constitute an offense, it is defective, and 'no court has jurisdiction to entertain it' "). As such, the defendant's conviction is void and "without legal effect." Commonwealth v. Martin, 476 Mass. 72, 76 (2016) (quotation omitted).

The judgment is vacated, the verdict is set aside, and the matter is dismissed.

So ordered.

Vacated; set aside; dismissed.