598 N.E.2d
North Eastern Reporter 2d (1978-2014) volume 598. View scanned PDF. View API.
- Gallagher v. Indiana State Election Board, 598 N.E.2d 510 (1992)
- Evans v. State, 598 N.E.2d 516 (1992)
- Brooks v. State, 598 N.E.2d 519 (1992)
- Nicks v. State, 598 N.E.2d 520 (1992)
- Dolliver v. State, 598 N.E.2d 525 (1992)
- Arvin North American Automotive v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training Services, 598 N.E.2d 532 (1992)
- Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Schafer, 598 N.E.2d 540 (1992)
- Nelson v. Denkins, 598 N.E.2d 558 (1992)
- Becker v. Plemmons, 598 N.E.2d 564 (1992)
- John v. Marion County Department of Public Welfare, 598 N.E.2d 570 (1992)
- Capps v. State, 598 N.E.2d 574 (1992)
- INB Banking Co. v. Opportunity Options, Inc., 598 N.E.2d 580 (1992)
- Roe v. State, 598 N.E.2d 586 (1992)
- King v. State, 598 N.E.2d 589 (1992)
- Van Scoik v. Kosciusko County Board of Zoning Appeals, 598 N.E.2d 594 (1992)
- Zelek v. Jankowski, 598 N.E.2d 596 (1992)
- Ricketts v. State, 598 N.E.2d 597 (1992)
- Indiana DLandowner's request for floodway construction permit was denied by the Natural Resources Commission (NRC), and landowner sought judicial review. The Marion Superior Court, James S. Kirsch, J., vacated NRC's order. NRC appealed. The Court of Appeals, Ratliff, C.J., held that: (1) landowner had burden of proving that no harm would come to fish, wildlife or botanical resources through its proposed construction; (2) property was "floodway" within meaning of Indiana Flood Control Act; and (8) landowner was not denied fundamental due process.epartment of Natural Resources v. United Refuse Co., 598 N.E.2d 603 (1992)
- Indiana Department of Public Welfare v. Payne, 598 N.E.2d 608 (1992)
- Weyls v. State, 598 N.E.2d 610 (1992)
- Prenatt v. Stevens, 598 N.E.2d 616 (1992)
- Barton v. State, 598 N.E.2d 623 (1992)
- City of Gary v. Allstate Insurance Co., 598 N.E.2d 625 (1992)
- Hawn v. Padgett, 598 N.E.2d 630 (1992)
- City of Portage v. Harrington, 598 N.E.2d 634 (1992)
- Harris v. State, 598 N.E.2d 639 (1992)
- First National Leasing v. Indiana Department of State Revenue, 598 N.E.2d 640 (1992)
- Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corp. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue, 598 N.E.2d 647 (1992)
- Davis v. State, 598 N.E.2d 1041 (1992)
- Adoptive Parents of M.L.V. v. Wilkens, 598 N.E.2d 1054 (1992)
- Richter v. State, 598 N.E.2d 1060 (1992)
- Smith v. Syd's, Inc., 598 N.E.2d 1065 (1992)
- Keane v. Pachter, 598 N.E.2d 1067 (1992)
- Detrick v. Midwest Pipe & Steel, Inc., 598 N.E.2d 1074 (1992)
- State v. Burroff, 598 N.E.2d 1081 (1992)
- Kroger Food Stores, Inc. v. Clark, 598 N.E.2d 1084 (1992)
- Babinchak v. Town of Chesterton, 598 N.E.2d 1099 (1992)
- Dale Bland Trucking, Inc. v. Kiger, 598 N.E.2d 1103 (1992)
- Jackson v. Paris, 598 N.E.2d 1106 (1992)
- Rebel v. National City Bank of Evansville, 598 N.E.2d 1108 (1992)
- Chambers ex rel. Hamm v. Ludlow, 598 N.E.2d 1111 (1992)
- Misztal v. State, 598 N.E.2d 1119 (1992)