The complaint is not orderly and precise,, but it, in substance and effect, alleges with sufficient intelligence a cause of action against all the defendants. . What is termed a second cause of action is, in substance, the first one, with facts alleged in aggravation of damages as to some of the defendants. If the demurrer should have been sustained as to the second cause of action, obviously it should not have been as to the first one.
It is important, proper and very much better, that all pleadings shall be orderly and formal, avoiding unnecessary repletion and redundancy in the allegations embraced by them, but thoagh they be informal and disorderly, if they set forth with reasonable certainty and intelligence the substance of the matter pleaded, the Court will take notice of and uphold them as pleadings, and, if need be, direct amendments as to mere matters of form.
The effect of sustaining the demurrer as a whole was to put the plaintiff out of Court, although he had sufficiently alleged a cause of action as to all the defendants. If he could not by reason of defects in the pleadings have recovered in the full measure and in every aspect of his case, as claimed by him, he should have been allowed to do so as far as he could. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Barrett, 95 N. C., 36.
The judgment must be reversed and further proceedings had in the action according to law.
Error.