The affidavit is sufficient, let a certi-orari issue.
And now on the return of the certiorari, the record shewed it to have been an action of covenant, in which the breach assigned was the non-payment of $2650, which Defendant, by his covenant had bound himself to pay. The Jury found that Defendants had paid to the Plaintiff $2650 15, and assessed the Plaintiff’s damages to thirty-nine dollars, twenty-nine cents ; thereupon, Defendant’s counsel moved, hut without success, to nonsuit the Plaintiff,
delivered the opinion of the Court:
This action is not brought on a bond, note, or liquidated account, and therefore, is not within the act of 1820, which declares, that in such cases, the jurisdiction of the Superior and County Courts shall be ousted by plea in abatement. Nor did the act which gives concurrent jurisdiction, in all cases for civil injuries, to the Superior and County Courts, alter the, mode of ousting jurisdiction in either. In this case, the declaration shows the nature of the demand, arid the verdict of the J ury the amount due 5 and there being no affidavit under the act of 1777, the Court Law. as it is calk'd, there must be judgment of ¡aeosuif.