State v. Randall, 87 N.C. 571 (1882)

Oct. 1882 · Supreme Court of North Carolina

87 N.C. 571

STATE v. JOHN RANDALL and others.

Transcript of Record — Power of Superior Court.

Omissions of material matter in the record of a trial for murder will be-supplied by certiorari, and the superior court has the power to order-such corrections as are necessary to make the record truthful.

(State v. Craton, 6 Ired., 164, cited and approved.)

Motion of prisoners for a certiorari beard at October Term,, 1882, of The Supreme Court.

The prisoners are indicted for murder, and were tried at Spring Term, 1882, of Buncombe Superior Court before-Bennett, J.

The jury returned'a verdict of guilty of manslaughter, and from the judgment pronounced, they appealed to this-court.

No statement of the case accompanies the record, and the prisoners in their petition for the certiorari state that numerous exceptions were taken during the progress of the trial, and ask that a transcript of the same, together with the record, be sent to- this court, to the end that they may be reviewed.

Attorney General, for the State.

Messrs. Moore, McLoud, Carter and Johnston & Shuford, for prisoners.

Smith, C. J.

In the examination of the record, we discover that it makes no mention of the arraignment of the prisoners, nor of their putting in any pleas to the charge preferred in the bill of indictment. This omission may result from the inadvertence of the clerk to make the proper entry upon his record, or in making out the transcript therefrom,, and presents a proper case for the award of the certiorari — the course pursued in State v. Craton, 6 Ired., 164, for the correction of the name of the judge who tried the cause in the court below.

If the fact be that there was no arraignment, no opportunity afforded the prisoners to plead, and no pleas put in io make an issue for the jury, t'heir verdict is a nullity as well as the judgment rendered thereon.

In this aspect of the case, and as the prisoners ask it, we -shall direct the issuing of the certiorari, to the end that such .corrections may be made in the superior court as are necessary to make the record truthful, of which the court has the undoubted power, as declared by Chief Justice Ruffin’ in ,the case referred to, and that a transcript thereof be sent to this court.

Pee Cueiam. Motion allowed.