In this case, which was a bill in equity, a decree was heretofore rendered in favor of the plaintiff for a considerable sum of money against the defendant W. H. Thomas, and the same not having been collected, nor any execution issued for the purpose, a motion on notice to W. L. Hilliard guardian of said Thomas was made at the last term of this court for leave to issue an execution, and thereupon it was referred to the clerk to inquire and report whether the said debt or any part thereof had been paid.
The clerk having filed his report showing that no part of the debt had been paid, the plaintiff at this term of the court renews his motion for execution, when W. L. Hilliard files his petition representing that W. H. Thomas is lunatic, *297and be is bis guardian, and praying tbat a sufficiency of tbe estate of the lunatic may be ascertained and set apart for tbe maintenance of himself and family before any execution is awarded.
It appears from the proceedings in the cause that the decree sought to be executed was obtained before the said Thomas became lunatic, and in such case, a guardian being appointed, be holds the estate as agent of the law with power by leave of the probate court to sell personal and real estate for the maintenance of the lunatic," or payment of debts unavoidably incurred for bis maintenance, but without the power to sell or apply any part of the estate to the discharge of the debts existing at the lunacy, except by order of the superior courts, in which courts alone the jurisdiction to order the payment of such debt resides. Bat. Rev., ch. 57, §§ 6 and 7, and Blake v. Respass, 77 N. C., 193.
Property of tbe lunatic put into tbe bands of a committee is to be regarded as in custodia legis, and no creditor can reach it for a pre-existing debt except through tbe order of tbe superior court, and tbat ofder is never made until first a sufficiency is ascertained and set apart for bis own maintenance and that of bis family,, if minors, and this administration of the estate is based on the idea tbat the sovereign owes the duty to a person thus unfortunate to devote his property primarily to his maintenance and to protect him against bis existing creditors, except in subordination thereto. Blake v. Respass, supra; Smith v. Pipkin, 79 N. C., 569; Ex parte Latham, 4 Ire. Eq., 231.
It being the duty of tbe court to provide for tbe maintenance of W. H. Thomas and to hold tbe plaintiff as entitled to tbe payment of bis decree only out of any residue tbat may be left, tbe case is not in such a condition as to authorize this court at this time to order tbe execution to issue or take other action for its immediate payment. The report of tbe clerk only ascertains tbat no part of the debt has been *298paid, and we have no inventory of the estate belonging to the lunatic out of which an adequate support may be assigned.
In such a state of the case, all that we can do is to continue the motion with leave to renew it again hereafter when a maintenance for the lunatic has been assigned ; and in the meantime to direct the guardian to proceed before the probate court of Jackson county to have a sufficiency of the lunatic’s estate set apart for his support and that of his family who are minors, and to report to this court when assigned, an inventory or schedule thereof, together with a descriptive list of any other estate of the lunatic not included in the allotment.
The motion of plaintiff is continued with leave to renew the same as herein expressed, and an order may be drawn directing W. L. Hilliard to proceed and report as herein indicated.
Pee Curiam. Order accordingly.