A record is a memorial of a Court of Justice. which the law deems authentic above all contradiction. Its purity ought, therefore, to be guarded with anxious vigilance, lest any entry should go forth to the. public as the act of a Court, which lias not in reality become such according to the forms of law. The certificate of the Clerk, as to tiie truth of a record, would have been conclusive upon the issue of nul lid record, and parol evidence to prove that it had not regularly become such, would have been inadmissible. Yet, when the inquiry is now made as to the manner in which this apparent record was made up, it appears, most'satisfactorily, that the. entry was made by the Cleric after die expiration of the term, and that the judgment vas, in fact, pronounced by the Judge after the right to do so had ceased. This is known to be frequently done, and for the purposes of justice and the convenience of suitors, under the best intentions on the part of the Judge, but still it cannot stand the test of legal examination. The effect of such a precedent might be most mischievous, if the entry of a clerk, made upon liis records after the term, were allowed to bind men’s rights and property to any extent.' "Whereas lew inconveniences can ensue from making the record speak the truth, provided an inquiry be instituted recently after the entry complained of has been made. In the case of Slocumb v. Anderson, there was the consent of all parties, and the intent of the. transaction was perfectly fair; but inasmuch as the judgment was entered up in vacation, it *76was ¡ie}(| t0 be a nullity, and the entry on the record ordered to be vacated. That case is an authority for a like order in the present one. The judgment must be reversed, and the entry of the clerk, made after term, bo annulled and expunged.
Lord Coke says, that ‘"records, being “ the rolls 01* memorials of the Judges, import in them- “ selves such ¡«controllable verity and credit, that .they “ admit of no proof or averment to the contrary. Inso- “ much that they are to he tried only by themselves ; for, “ otherwise, there would be Do end of controversies. But “ during the term wherein any judicial act is done, the “ roll is glterable in that term, as the Judges shall direct. “ When the term is past, then the record ndmitteth of no “ alteration, or averment or proof that it is false.”* If this be the legal definition of a record, the entry here, that on argument, a new trial was refused,” and the judgment of the Cour.t consequent thereupon being made on Sunday, after the expiration of the term, as the affidavits state is the fact, forms no part of the record of the suit between the parties. If it should be so considered, any entry made in vacation must be considered in the same light; which, in the words of Coke, would give rise to innumerable controversies: and where a Clerk certifies entries so made, he certifies that as a record, which, according to the same authority, is not a record. This is an answer to the affidavits. But a record is certified by the Clerk in due form, and it is required that we should direct the Clerk to alter it upon the strength of those affidavits. That, 1 think, we cannot do. The record appears to be perfect; and it can only be tried by itself. But we can advise the Clerk, that if he made it up as he himself states in ids affidavit he did, it is no record; that he is to consider nothing as the record between the parties but what was entered in term lime; and that as he did wrong *77in making the entry, he, and not we, may correct it by expunging from the record that which really never belonged to it. "When this alteration shall be made, the truth will be seen, and the rule for a new trial will remain undisposed of. But if the entry made on Sunday be considered as disposing of that rule, it may also be considered as an authority for him to issue execution on the judgment obtained, which, surely, cannot be; for the rule for anew trial was obtained in term time, and is a record, and the discharge of it was entered in vacation, and was not a record; and, therefore, the question,.whether there shall be a new trial, still remains open. If the Clerk should issue execution, he will do it at his peril. Mis better way is to expunge from the record book any entry that was made after the expiration of the term. '
Murphey, Judge, sat in the place of Judge Hexder-son, who had been of counsel in the cause at the Bar. He concurred in the opinion given by the Chiee-Justice.
So that the decision of the Court below upon the last rule obtained by the Defendant at October term, 18 3 9, was reversed; and this Court ordered the said entry of the Clerk, made after the expiration of April term, 1819, to be annulled and expunged.