¥e do not know what sort of a case was-' disclosed by the evidence, but we can see'that the warrant ought to have been quashed on defendants’ motion, on the-ground that it, or the affidavit alleged no threat, fact or circumstance from which the Court could determine whether the “ fear” of the prosecutor was well founded or not, nor for which the prosecutor if swearing falsely could be prosecu*539ted. There being no charge against the defendants, of course they could not be taxed with the costs.
Error. Let this be certified and the proceedings quashed below.
Pee'Curiam. Judgment reversed.