One of the giounds of demurrer assigned is that the plaintiff in his complaint has joined a cause of action on contract, with one for an injury to property, which is not allowed by C. C. P, §126. Logan v. Wallis, 76 N. C. 416.
An action for a penalty given by statute to any person injured, is an action on contract. This has been the settled *24law. 3 Blackstone’s Com. 158, 160, 161. These authorities were cited by Subbard and Clarke for defendant, and sustain their position on that point. Judge Story saysan action of assumpsit will lie upon a statutory liability. Opinion of Story, J., in Bullard v. Bell, 1 Mason Rep. 243, 292, 299.
It is equally clear that an action to recover damages for illegally obstructing a navigable river, is an action for an injury to property, as it is called in C. C. P. § 126, or as it may more briefly and quite as intelligibly be called, an ac-tion in tort.
We sustain the demurrer on this ground, and it is unnecessary to consider any others. If when the Judge sustained the demurrer, the plaintiff had requested the Judge to divide the action, we may assume that he would have done so .under § 131 of C. C. P., but this Court cannot do it.
Demurrer sustained. Defendants will go without day and ■recover costs in this Court.
Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
The cases of Roberts v. A. & N. C. R. R. Co., and of Sanders v. A. & N. C. R. R. Co., áre in all respects material for the present purpose, similar to the above case. The judgment is the same in these as in the above case, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case.