In this case it does not appear in the complaint what portion of the dower land is cleared, but for aught that is shown by the complaint the whole dower land may be grown up in old field pines like the ten acres about, to be cleared. But suppose the defects in the complaint are supplied by the answer, still we think his Honor was right, in dissolving the injunction. By the answer it appears,, that there were 103 acres of the dower lands, of which about. 50 acres are cleared, and that of these 50 acres a portion thereof is worn out and has become unfit for cultivation and is now left to grow up in pine, like the 10 acres about to be-cleared for cultivation. So that, using the answer to supply the manifest defects in the complaint, the case made by the pleadings is this, to-wit: The intestate, Conyers, at his. *238.death, owned in fee a tract of land of 303 acres, and out of which tract there was assigned to his widow, as dower, 103 .acres; that at a public sale for the payment of debts, the plaintiff purchased and now owns the whole tract, subject •to the widow’s right of dower in the 103 acres, part of the ;said tract. That of the 103 assigned as dower, about one-half thereof was cleared, and of the balance some 20 acres .are now in timber of the original growth and some 30 acres •in old field pine, and of the cleared land a portion thereof is •worn out and is left to grow up in pine like the 10 acres .about to be cleared. It also appearing that most of the timber about to be cut on the 10 acres will be required for repairing the fences around the cultivated land, and that the •means of support of the widow and children require these 10 acres to be cleared and cultivated; that such clearing will enhance instead of diminishing the value of the estate. There is no statement in the complaint or answer as to the condition in regard to the timber of the 200 acres of the plaintiff not encumbered with the dower, and for aught that ^.appears the larger portion thereof may be in timber.
Upon the above statement of the case, we are of opinion that the injunction heretofore granted was properly dissolved. The cases cited for defendant fully sustain the ruling of his Honor.
We are further of opinion that the complaint does not state a case that entitled the plaintiff to the original restraining order.
There is no error. This will be certified.
Injunction dissolved.