(After stating the facts as above.) This case differs from the other case between the same parties, decided at this term, in this : in that, the amercement was for not making due return upon a venditionas ex-ponas, issued after the return of the fi. fa., and was made in the Superior Court at Fall Term 1868, which was subsequent to the ratification of the Code of Civil Procedure ; in this, the amercement and the teste of the original sci. fa. was in May 1868, and before the ratification of the Code, which was in August 1868. Section 400, C. C. P. authorizes the transfer of all suits pending at its ratification, to the proper Superior Courts; section 402 says they shall be proceeded in and tried under the existing laws and rules applicable thereto; and section 362, which abolishes the writ of scire facias, says that any proceedings theretofore commenced shall not be affected by such abolition. The sci. fa. tested of May Term 1868, was the commencement of this action, and, it was consequently governed by the existing rules of practice and procedure. Teague v. James, 63 N. C. 91.
The judgment below must be reversed, and the demurrer *83overruled, and tire defendant ordered to answer over. Let this opinion be certified.
Per, Cttrtaw. Judgment reversed.